Melchizedek Again

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

I'd like to insert a little thought here.
The word states that Jesus Christ is the Only ***Begotten***** 
In My understanding, begotten means , inply's and iludes to the concept
that he did have a natural parent of the flesh, born of woman, one who has
actually experienced the miracle of being born.
Jesus frequently referred to himself as the son of man. (referring to his
fleshly heiritage from his mothers side).

When referring to Melchizidek as a theophany, you are not takeing away
anything from the exclusiveness of the *only begotten 8 status of THe man
Christ Jesus since it was only his flesh that was begotten anyway. 
A supernaturally created body that did not go through the birthing process
and which was Not a seed of man would not be in conflict .
It is just a form God used to represent himself, before the fulness of time
had come.
(THe birth of Jesus)
We forget that the original Adam was a created body from dust.
If God made yet another would that violate Jesus's preeminence as Being the
only Begotten Son OF GOD?
No.
It is the process of Jesus's (the flesh) creation that made him special (as
a man) since he did not have a natural or fleshly father but was the result
of Mary's being over shadoweed By The HOLYGHOST.
We must not forget that the Spirit which dwelt in the body of Jesus Christ
is that same Eternal God, THe Same Spirit of truth, There is only One God
and the seperateness of Jesus  from God extends only to his fleshly body,
not a seperate Spirit.
So , If it is th esame Spirit that created Adam, creating Melchizidek
(without mother and without father) Then Jesus IS STILL the *only Begotten!
Get IT? 
You are not begotten unless you had a human parent and went through the
birth process.
Too me I see no conflict.
I can still believe in One God, Jesus being his only begotten Son, and that
he occasionally uses other forms to appear before mankind.
It's Good To be back on!
God Bless.
Lynna