henryrna@juno.com (HENRY L BUNCH): Re: Melchizedek

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

In a message dated 97-11-05 05:13:40 EST, you write:

<<   5 And they called <07121> (8799) unto Lot <03876>, and said <0559>
     (8799) unto him, Where [are] the *MEN* <0582> which came in <0935>
                                       ^^^
     (8804) to thee this night <03915>? bring them out <03318> (8685) unto
     us, that we may know <03045> (8799) them.
 
 
 Note that Ge 19:1 calles these beings "angels", yet v5 calls them
 "men".  
 
 Come on, Bro. Gossett, you can't have it both ways; which is it?  Were
 they angels, or were they men?  And was Melchizedek a man, yet without
 controversy even like unto a theophany?  I think so. >>

Bro. Brown, you might want to take notice that it was the men of Sodom that
referred to these as men, thats probably not the best support base in the
world. 
Pastor Fitzgerel